King Micheal Hastings………

To add further spice to the mix re: the British Royals - Queen Victoria. From her came all of the incidences of haemophilia affecting European Royal families in the 19th and 20th Centuries. As we all know, haemophilia is hereditary - it is inherited from either one’s mother or one’s father. However, this is where it gets very interesting concerning Queen Victoria.

The House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, the family of Queen Victoria’s mother, Victoria, the Dowager Duchess of Kent, had no history of haemophilia but, neither did the Royal House of Hanover, the family of Queen Victoria’s “alleged” father, Edward, Duke of Kent! Since we know who Queen Victoria’s mother was, who then, was her father? Who sired the longest reigning monarch in British history?

Aside from the issues covered by Tony Robinson in ‘Britain’s Real Monarch’ back in 2004, Queen Victoria’s suspected illegitimacy means that the throne, for the time being, should be held by Ernest Augustus of Hanover, Princess Caroline of Monaco’s stepson.

Food for thought.

1)In 1470 Henry VI, the last Lancastrian King of England made it Law(by Act of Parliament), that should his own legitimate line become extinct, the Throne should pass to the legitimate heirs of George, Duke pf Clarence(Henry VI’s cousin who was part Yorkist-part Lancastrian). When Edward IV murdered Henry VI in 1471 and usurped his throne, the legal and rightful Lancastrian heir was George, Duke of Clarence, NOT Henry Tudor, who descended from the Royal Family via a bastard line.

2)In 1484, following the death of his only son, Richard III, last Yorkist King of England, made it Law(by Act of Parliament) that should he die having failed to produce another son, the Throne was to pass to the legitimate heris of his brother George, Duke of Clarence. King Richard III was killed the following year by traitors loyal to Henry Tudor(who then married Elizabeth IV’s daughter)

3)Under both Lancastrian and Yorkist Law, Henry Tudor had NO claim whatsoever, as he was a bastard.

4)Under both Lancastrian and Yorkist Law, Edward IV’s descendants had NO claim whatsoever. Under Lancastrian Law, Edward’s bastardy was recognised, and Edward had committed High Treason. Under Yorkist Law, it was Legally official that Edward IvV had never married his “wife” Elizabeth Woodville, thus his children were bastards.

5)The Tudors recognised the significance of Clarence’s descendants and persecuted/murdered numerous members of the family. The Abney-Hastings line is the Senior Royal line now, as a result of so many True Royals being assassinated by the usurpers!

Long Live His Majesty King Michael. May God and Man restore what should Rightly be!

I would advise him not to linger at Derby
Very sagacious Donald - personally I would advise anybody to linger in the Derby area

I’ll be arriving at Glenfinnan in May and I hope our plans don’t clash
He needn’t come to Wybers Wood either Donald the area is suitably stocked with candidates for kingship - this town ain’t big enough for the both of us !

Cheers
Rod